Dan's Blog
Recent Posts
Contents
Categories
- Agriculture
- Autism
- Economy
- Education
- Energy Independence
- Energy Jolt
- Environment
- Foreign Policy
- Health Care
- Hot Topic
- Hurricane Relief
- Illegal Immigration
- Jobs
- Physician's Issues
- Second Amendment
- September 11
- Social Security
- State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
- Stimulus Funding
- Tax Reform
- Tribute to a fallen veteran
- Veterans Affairs
- Wall Street Bailout
- War on Terror
- Weekly Roundup
Search Dan's Blog
Authors
Dates
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Earmarks
Posted by Dan Burton on July 28, 2008
Good morning friends.
You may be pleased to know that I have joined many of my colleagues in requesting Speaker Pelosi and Chairman Obey to secure their commitment that thousands of earmarks with billions of dollars will not be airdropped into a potential continuing resolution or omnibus-spending bill. We have asked this because it is becoming increasingly unlikely that the fiscal year 2009 appropriations bills will be considered on the floor of the House of Representatives this session.
To date, five appropriations bills including more than 2,000 earmarks worth more than $2.2 billion have been favorably reported by the Appropriations Committee. Media reports have also indicated that the ultimate level of spending on earmarks in the fiscal year 2009-appropriation bills could be as high as the $18.3 billion spent on earmarks last year. Even those who support the practice of earmarking agree that these earmarks should be subject to debate on the House floor.
Speaker Pelosi has previously indicated her commitment to “auditing the books and subjecting every facet of federal spending to tough budget discipline and accountability.” We hope she would agree that allowing earmarks to be approved in spending bills without so much as a cursory vetting on the House floor would be inconsistent with this pledge.
You may be pleased to know that I have joined many of my colleagues in requesting Speaker Pelosi and Chairman Obey to secure their commitment that thousands of earmarks with billions of dollars will not be airdropped into a potential continuing resolution or omnibus-spending bill. We have asked this because it is becoming increasingly unlikely that the fiscal year 2009 appropriations bills will be considered on the floor of the House of Representatives this session.
To date, five appropriations bills including more than 2,000 earmarks worth more than $2.2 billion have been favorably reported by the Appropriations Committee. Media reports have also indicated that the ultimate level of spending on earmarks in the fiscal year 2009-appropriation bills could be as high as the $18.3 billion spent on earmarks last year. Even those who support the practice of earmarking agree that these earmarks should be subject to debate on the House floor.
Speaker Pelosi has previously indicated her commitment to “auditing the books and subjecting every facet of federal spending to tough budget discipline and accountability.” We hope she would agree that allowing earmarks to be approved in spending bills without so much as a cursory vetting on the House floor would be inconsistent with this pledge.